On this expression:
(true ? "a" : "b")[index()]
"g++ -Wunused-value" incorrectly produces
warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value]
From the -fdump-tree-original output:
if ((void) SAVE_EXPR <index ()>, 1)
{
(void) "a"[SAVE_EXPR <index ()>];
}
else
{
(void) "b"[SAVE_EXPR <index ()>];
}
Observe that we evaluate index() (and save it) before evaluating the
ternary expression. Since "(void) SAVE_EXPR <index ()>" is ostensibly
side-effect free, we get this warning. Since SAVE_EXPR is not useless,
this is a false positive. Also the comma operator compiler-generated,
so warning about it is wrong.
Suppress this warning for this implicit expression. Test that the
warning is gone for "$ternary[index()]" but we still warn on cases like
"$ternary[(1, 0)]".
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck.cc (cp_build_array_ref): Suppress unused-value
warning for implicit comma expression.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/warn/Wunused-value-2.C: New test.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Altmanninger <aclopte@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
{
idx = save_expr (idx);
op0 = save_expr (op0);
+ warning_sentinel w (warn_unused_value);
tree tem = build_compound_expr (loc, op0, idx);
op0 = build_compound_expr (loc, tem, op0);
}
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile }
+// { dg-options "-Wall" }
+
+static int index() { return 0; }
+
+volatile int global;
+static int index_with_side_effect() {
+ global += 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ const bool cond = argc == 10;
+ (void)(cond ? "" : "")[index()];
+ (void)(cond ? "" : "")[index_with_side_effect()];
+ (void)(cond ? "" : "")[(1, 0)]; // { dg-warning "left operand of comma operator has no effect" }
+}