package_rpm.bbclass: Remove a misleading bb.note()

It should have been removed in 3db9d865 (classes/package_rpm.bbclass:
Enhance diagnostic messages) when it was split in two new notes.

Also change the casing of two other notes to align them with the other
notes.

Signed-off-by: Peter Kjellerstedt <peter.kjellerstedt@axis.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
index a605a57ecc3e538bee974b83441a8de6cc092b30..9145717f98ad979d93e3bc86507c8e560c9abc80 100644 (file)
--- a/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/package_rpm.bbclass
@@ -409,7 +409,6 @@ python write_specfile () {
             if not file_list and localdata.getVar('ALLOW_EMPTY', False) != "1":
                 bb.note("Not creating empty RPM package for %s" % splitname)
             else:
-                bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
                 spec_files_top.append('%files')
                 if extra_pkgdata:
                     package_rpm_extra_pkgdata(splitname, spec_files_top, localdata)
@@ -418,7 +417,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
                     bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
                     spec_files_top.extend(file_list)
                 else:
-                    bb.note("Creating EMPTY RPM Package for %s" % splitname)
+                    bb.note("Creating empty RPM package for %s" % splitname)
                 spec_files_top.append('')
             continue
 
@@ -510,7 +509,7 @@ python write_specfile () {
                 bb.note("Creating RPM package for %s" % splitname)
                 spec_files_bottom.extend(file_list)
             else:
-                bb.note("Creating EMPTY RPM Package for %s" % splitname)
+                bb.note("Creating empty RPM package for %s" % splitname)
             spec_files_bottom.append('')
 
         del localdata