The warning compares the position of a field depending on whether or not the
previous base/field is considered a POD for layout, but failed to consider
whether the previous base/field is empty; layout of an empty base doesn't
consider PODness.
PR c++/120012
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* class.cc (check_non_pod_aggregate): Check is_empty_class.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/abi/base-defaulted2.C: New test.
tree type = TREE_TYPE (field);
if (TYPE_IDENTIFIER (type) == as_base_identifier)
type = TYPE_CONTEXT (type);
- if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type) || (!CLASSTYPE_NON_POD_AGGREGATE (type)
- && !CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE_POD (type)))
+ if (!CLASS_TYPE_P (type)
+ || is_empty_class (type)
+ || (!CLASSTYPE_NON_POD_AGGREGATE (type)
+ && !CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE_POD (type)))
return;
tree size = end_of_class (type, (DECL_FIELD_IS_BASE (field)
? eoc_nvsize : eoc_nv_or_dsize));
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-fabi-version=20 -Wabi" }
+
+struct Base {
+protected:
+ Base() = default;
+ ~Base() = default;
+};
+
+struct Derived : Base {
+ void* ptr; // { dg-bogus "offset" }
+};