irq_domain_add_tree() is going away as being obsolete now. Switch to
the preferred irq_domain_create_tree(). That differs in the first
parameter: It takes more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of struct
device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
[ tglx: Fix up subject prefix ]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250319092951.37667-23-jirislaby@kernel.org
if (!name)
return -ENOMEM;
- ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_tree(pdev->dev.of_node,
- &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
+ ipcc->irq_domain = irq_domain_create_tree(of_fwnode_handle(pdev->dev.of_node),
+ &qcom_ipcc_irq_ops, ipcc);
if (!ipcc->irq_domain)
return -ENOMEM;