* doc/automake.texi (Sources): Typo, reported by Karl Berry.

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index e3054644264e710ea1c440f10620f126ff3e5f8b..6a62a75f986445b500e94fcecd531fbfe5187bfd 100644 (file)
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2004-10-11  Alexandre Duret-Lutz  <adl@gnu.org>
+
+       * doc/automake.texi (Sources): Typo, reported by Karl Berry.
+
 2004-10-10  Kelley Cook  <kcook@gcc.gnu.org>  (tiny change)
            Alexandre Duret-Lutz  <adl@gnu.org>
 

diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi
index e03eab3e3d75c561a02a403aa46cfd452e928c1f..b735056c9e7234181f5790ad53fd59a4df7054d1 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/automake.texi
+++ b/doc/automake.texi
@@ -4629,7 +4629,7 @@ sources: they preexist and do not need to be built.  Suppose that
 records the @file{foo.h} dependency so that following invocations of
 @command{make} will honor it.  In these conditions, it's clear there is
 no problem: either @file{foo.o} doesn't exist and has to be built
-(regardless of the dependencies), either accurate dependencies exist and
+(regardless of the dependencies), or accurate dependencies exist and
 they can be used to decide whether @file{foo.o} should be rebuilt.
 
 It's a different story if @file{foo.h} doesn't exist by the first

diff --git a/doc/stamp-vti b/doc/stamp-vti
index 4e1bae8e531e259a67297fe39d246e4a3d5e98ee..4069ee15edac87c339f3eb8acee5e68675bbc417 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/stamp-vti
+++ b/doc/stamp-vti
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@set UPDATED 10 October 2004
+@set UPDATED 11 October 2004
 @set UPDATED-MONTH October 2004
 @set EDITION 1.9a
 @set VERSION 1.9a

diff --git a/doc/version.texi b/doc/version.texi
index 4e1bae8e531e259a67297fe39d246e4a3d5e98ee..4069ee15edac87c339f3eb8acee5e68675bbc417 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/version.texi
+++ b/doc/version.texi
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@set UPDATED 10 October 2004
+@set UPDATED 11 October 2004
 @set UPDATED-MONTH October 2004
 @set EDITION 1.9a
 @set VERSION 1.9a