The variables checked for are mandatory in all cases so a QA check does
not seem to be the right choice for this. Additionally, the code never
called `exit_if_errors` so the reported QA issue didn't actually fail
the task.
Signed-off-by: Philip Lorenz <philip.lorenz@bmw.de>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand <mathieu.dubois-briand@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
packages-list patch-fuzz patch-status perllocalpod perm-config perm-line perm-link recipe-naming \
pkgconfig pkgvarcheck pkgv-undefined pn-overrides shebang-size src-uri-bad symlink-to-sysroot \
unhandled-features-check unknown-configure-option unlisted-pkg-lics uppercase-pn useless-rpaths \
- var-undefined virtual-slash xorg-driver-abi"
+ virtual-slash xorg-driver-abi"
# Elect whether a given type of error is a warning or error, they may
# have been set by other files.
pn = d.getVar('PN')
if not workdir or not outdir or not dest or not dvar or not pn:
- msg = "WORKDIR, DEPLOY_DIR, D, PN and PKGD all must be defined, unable to package"
- oe.qa.handle_error("var-undefined", msg, d)
+ bb.fatal("WORKDIR, DEPLOY_DIR, D, PN and PKGD all must be defined, unable to package")
return
bb.build.exec_func("package_setup_pkgv", d)