+2011-02-16 Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
+
+ autoconf: tune long long tests, particularly for c99
+
+ This change is imported from gnulib.
+ * lib/autoconf/types.m4 (AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_INT): Don't bother compiling
+ or running anything if c99, or if unsigned long long int does not
+ work. In either case, we know the answer without further tests.
+ Do not compile _AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET twice. Instead, compile
+ it at most once, and use its results for both long long int and
+ unsigned long long int. This is more likely to be efficient in
+ the common case where the program wants to check for both long
+ long int and unsigned long long int.
+ (AC_TYPE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT): Don't bother compiling if c99,
+ since the answer is already known.
+
2011-02-15 Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
doc: fix debug advice typo
# ---------------------
AC_DEFUN([AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_INT],
[
+ AC_REQUIRE([AC_TYPE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT])
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for long long int], [ac_cv_type_long_long_int],
- [AC_LINK_IFELSE(
- [_AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET],
- [dnl This catches a bug in Tandem NonStop Kernel (OSS) cc -O circa 2004.
- dnl If cross compiling, assume the bug isn't important, since
- dnl nobody cross compiles for this platform as far as we know.
- AC_RUN_IFELSE(
- [AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
- [[@%:@include <limits.h>
- @%:@ifndef LLONG_MAX
- @%:@ define HALF \
- (1LL << (sizeof (long long int) * CHAR_BIT - 2))
- @%:@ define LLONG_MAX (HALF - 1 + HALF)
- @%:@endif]],
- [[long long int n = 1;
- int i;
- for (i = 0; ; i++)
- {
- long long int m = n << i;
- if (m >> i != n)
- return 1;
- if (LLONG_MAX / 2 < m)
- break;
- }
- return 0;]])],
- [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=yes],
- [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=no],
- [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=yes])],
- [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=no])])
+ [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=yes
+ if test "x${ac_cv_prog_cc_c99-no}" = xno; then
+ ac_cv_type_long_long_int=$ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int
+ if test $ac_cv_type_long_long_int = yes; then
+ dnl Catch a bug in Tandem NonStop Kernel (OSS) cc -O circa 2004.
+ dnl If cross compiling, assume the bug is not important, since
+ dnl nobody cross compiles for this platform as far as we know.
+ AC_RUN_IFELSE(
+ [AC_LANG_PROGRAM(
+ [[@%:@include <limits.h>
+ @%:@ifndef LLONG_MAX
+ @%:@ define HALF \
+ (1LL << (sizeof (long long int) * CHAR_BIT - 2))
+ @%:@ define LLONG_MAX (HALF - 1 + HALF)
+ @%:@endif]],
+ [[long long int n = 1;
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; ; i++)
+ {
+ long long int m = n << i;
+ if (m >> i != n)
+ return 1;
+ if (LLONG_MAX / 2 < m)
+ break;
+ }
+ return 0;]])],
+ [],
+ [ac_cv_type_long_long_int=no])
+ fi
+ fi])
if test $ac_cv_type_long_long_int = yes; then
- AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT], 1,
+ AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT], [1],
[Define to 1 if the system has the type `long long int'.])
fi
])
[
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for unsigned long long int],
[ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int],
- [AC_LINK_IFELSE(
- [_AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET],
- [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=yes],
- [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=no])])
+ [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=yes
+ if test "x${ac_cv_prog_cc_c99-no}" = xno; then
+ AC_LINK_IFELSE(
+ [_AC_TYPE_LONG_LONG_SNIPPET],
+ [],
+ [ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int=no])
+ fi])
if test $ac_cv_type_unsigned_long_long_int = yes; then
- AC_DEFINE([HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT], 1,
+ AC_DEFINE([HAVE_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG_INT], [1],
[Define to 1 if the system has the type `unsigned long long int'.])
fi
])