In this test, we have
static inline const int c = b;
in a class template, and we call store_init_value as usual. There, the
value is
IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR<const float>(b)
which is is_nondependent_static_init_expression but isn't
is_nondependent_constant_expression (they only differ in STRICT).
We call fold_non_dependent_expr, but that just returns the expression
because it only instantiates is_nondependent_constant_expression
expressions. Since we're not checking the initializer of a constexpr
variable, we go on to call maybe_constant_init, whereupon we crash
because it tries to evaluate all is_nondependent_static_init_expression
expressions, which our value is, but it still contains a template code.
I think the fix is to call fold_non_dependent_init instead of
maybe_constant_init, and only call fold_non_dependent_expr on the
"this is a constexpr variable" path so as to avoid instantiating twice
in a row. Outside a template this should also avoid evaluating the
value twice.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/97975
* constexpr.c (fold_non_dependent_init): Add a tree parameter.
Use it.
* cp-tree.h (fold_non_dependent_init): Add a tree parameter with
a default value.
* typeck2.c (store_init_value): Call fold_non_dependent_expr
only when checking the initializer for constexpr variables.
Call fold_non_dependent_init instead of maybe_constant_init.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/97975
* g++.dg/cpp1z/inline-var8.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit
69bf1c7d5ee21392334f1982d1b40c38e103bbd4)
tree
fold_non_dependent_init (tree t,
tsubst_flags_t complain /*=tf_warning_or_error*/,
- bool manifestly_const_eval /*=false*/)
+ bool manifestly_const_eval /*=false*/,
+ tree object /* = NULL_TREE */)
{
if (t == NULL_TREE)
return NULL_TREE;
if (processing_template_decl)
{
t = fold_non_dependent_expr_template (t, complain,
- manifestly_const_eval, NULL_TREE);
+ manifestly_const_eval, object);
/* maybe_constant_init does this stripping, so do it here too. */
if (TREE_CODE (t) == TARGET_EXPR)
{
return t;
}
- return maybe_constant_init (t, NULL_TREE, manifestly_const_eval);
+ return maybe_constant_init (t, object, manifestly_const_eval);
}
/* Like maybe_constant_value, but returns a CONSTRUCTOR directly, rather
tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error);
extern tree fold_non_dependent_init (tree,
tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error,
- bool = false);
+ bool = false, tree = NULL_TREE);
extern tree fold_simple (tree);
extern bool reduced_constant_expression_p (tree);
extern bool is_instantiation_of_constexpr (tree);
{
bool const_init;
tree oldval = value;
- value = fold_non_dependent_expr (value, tf_warning_or_error, true, decl);
if (DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (decl)
|| (DECL_IN_AGGR_P (decl)
&& DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
{
+ value = fold_non_dependent_expr (value, tf_warning_or_error,
+ /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true,
+ decl);
/* Diagnose a non-constant initializer for constexpr variable or
non-inline in-class-initialized static data member. */
if (!require_constant_expression (value))
value = cxx_constant_init (value, decl);
}
else
- value = maybe_constant_init (value, decl, true);
+ value = fold_non_dependent_init (value, tf_warning_or_error,
+ /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true, decl);
if (TREE_CODE (value) == CONSTRUCTOR && cp_has_mutable_p (type))
/* Poison this CONSTRUCTOR so it can't be copied to another
constexpr variable. */
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/97975
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+
+template <class>
+class A
+{
+ static const float b;
+ static inline const int c = b;
+};
+
+A<int> a;
+
+struct B
+{
+ static const float b;
+ static inline const int c = b;
+};