Backport r246995

2017-05-29  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>

	Backport from mainline
	2017-04-19  Paulo J. Matos  <paulo@matos-sorge.com>

	PR lto/50345
	* doc/lto.texi: Remove an extra 'that'.

From-SVN: r248567

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 8f417fcb6e8e275098677d05c78f3fb29cc414d0..cb6fa301637e0859d8f98879faca863074c6793c 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+2017-05-29  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
+
+       Backport from mainline
+       2017-04-19  Paulo J. Matos  <paulo@matos-sorge.com>
+
+       PR lto/50345
+       * doc/lto.texi: Remove an extra 'that'.
+
 2017-05-29  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
 
        Backport from mainline

diff --git a/gcc/doc/lto.texi b/gcc/doc/lto.texi
index 41fd97223ac9e772d2b846ea27f6d7f976898642..25d9cc15ee008eab8dce55a2c732a2bedc5e57c8 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/doc/lto.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/lto.texi
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ existing build systems, as one can, for instance, produce archives of
 the files.  Additionally, one might be able to ship one set of fat
 objects which could be used both for development and the production of
 optimized builds.  A, perhaps surprising, side effect of this feature
-is that any mistake in the toolchain that leads to LTO information not
+is that any mistake in the toolchain leads to LTO information not
 being used (e.g.@: an older @code{libtool} calling @code{ld} directly).
 This is both an advantage, as the system is more robust, and a
 disadvantage, as the user is not informed that the optimization has