log_warn(LD_BUG, "Called when we have UseBridges set.");
if (should_use_directory_guards(options)) {
- const node_t *node = guards_choose_dirguard(type, guard_state_out);
+ const node_t *node = guards_choose_dirguard(guard_state_out);
if (node)
rs = node->rs;
} else {
* sort of dir fetch we'll be doing, so it won't return a bridge
* that can't answer our question.
*/
- const node_t *node = guards_choose_dirguard(type,
- &guard_state);
+ const node_t *node = guards_choose_dirguard(&guard_state);
if (node && node->ri) {
/* every bridge has a routerinfo. */
routerinfo_t *ri = node->ri;
status = "up";
}
-
node = entry_guard_find_node(e);
if (node) {
node_get_verbose_nickname(node, nbuf);
/** Helper: pick a directory guard, with whatever algorithm is used. */
const node_t *
-guards_choose_dirguard(dirinfo_type_t info,
- circuit_guard_state_t **guard_state_out)
-{
- /* XXXX prop271 We don't need to look at the dirinfo_type_t here,
- * apparently. If you look at the old implementation, and you follow info
- * downwards through choose_random_dirguard(), into
- * choose_random_entry_impl(), into populate_live_entry_guards()... you
- * find out that it isn't even used, and hasn't been since 0.2.7.1-alpha,
- * when we realized that every Tor on the network would support
- * microdescriptors. -NM */
- (void) info;
+guards_choose_dirguard(circuit_guard_state_t **guard_state_out)
+{
const node_t *r = NULL;
if (entry_guard_pick_for_circuit(get_guard_selection_info(),
GUARD_USAGE_DIRGUARD,
int guards_update_all(void);
const node_t *guards_choose_guard(cpath_build_state_t *state,
circuit_guard_state_t **guard_state_out);
-const node_t *guards_choose_dirguard(dirinfo_type_t info,
- circuit_guard_state_t **guard_state_out);
+const node_t *guards_choose_dirguard(circuit_guard_state_t **guard_state_out);
#if 1
/* XXXX NM I would prefer that all of this stuff be private to