Here we ICE when gimplifying
enum class Type { Pawn };
struct Piece {
Type type : 4;
};
void foo() {
switch (Piece().type)
case Type::Pawn:;
}
because we ended up with TYPE_PRECISION (cond) < TYPE_PRECISION (case).
That's because the case expr type here is the unlowered type Type,
whereas the conditional's type is the lowered <unnamed-signed:4>. This
is not supposed to happen: see the comment in pop_switch around the
is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type check.
But here we did not revert to the lowered SWITCH_STMT_TYPE, because
the conditional contains a TARGET_EXPR, which has side-effects, which
means that finish_switch_cond -> maybe_cleanup_point_expr wraps it
in a CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR. And is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type does
not see through those.
PR c++/103825
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck.cc (is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type): Handle
CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/enum44.C: New test.
case NEGATE_EXPR:
case NON_LVALUE_EXPR:
case BIT_NOT_EXPR:
+ case CLEANUP_POINT_EXPR:
return is_bitfield_expr_with_lowered_type (TREE_OPERAND (exp, 0));
case COMPONENT_REF:
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/103825
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+enum class Type { Pawn };
+struct Piece {
+ Type type : 4;
+};
+
+void
+foo ()
+{
+ switch (Piece().type)
+ case Type::Pawn:;
+
+ auto x = Piece().type;
+ switch (x)
+ case Type::Pawn:;
+}
+
+enum class En {A};
+struct St {En field :1;};
+
+void
+bar ()
+{
+ volatile St s = {En::A};
+ switch(s.field) {
+ case En::A : break;
+ }
+}