Lack of symbolic information prevents op1_range from beig able to draw
the same conclusions as fold_range can.
PR tree-optimization/111009
gcc/
* range-op.cc (operator_addr_expr::op1_range): Be more restrictive.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/pr111009.c: New.
const irange &op2,
relation_trio) const
{
- return operator_addr_expr::fold_range (r, type, lhs, op2);
+ if (empty_range_varying (r, type, lhs, op2))
+ return true;
+
+ // Return a non-null pointer of the LHS type (passed in op2), but only
+ // if we cant overflow, eitherwise a no-zero offset could wrap to zero.
+ // See PR 111009.
+ if (!contains_zero_p (lhs) && TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (type))
+ r = range_nonzero (type);
+ else
+ r.set_varying (type);
+ return true;
}
\f
// Initialize any integral operators to the primary table
--- /dev/null
+/* PR tree-optimization/111009 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fno-strict-overflow" } */
+
+struct dso {
+ struct dso * next;
+ int maj;
+};
+
+__attribute__((noipa)) static void __dso_id__cmp_(void) {}
+
+__attribute__((noipa))
+static int bug(struct dso * d, struct dso *dso)
+{
+ struct dso **p = &d;
+ struct dso *curr = 0;
+
+ while (*p) {
+ curr = *p;
+ // prevent null deref below
+ if (!dso) return 1;
+ if (dso == curr) return 1;
+
+ int *a = &dso->maj;
+ // null deref
+ if (!(a && *a)) __dso_id__cmp_();
+
+ p = &curr->next;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+__attribute__((noipa))
+int main(void) {
+ struct dso d = { 0, 0, };
+ bug(&d, 0);
+}
+