This functionality could be shared for other commands, too, so move
it to a common function. In addition, implement the validation in a
bit more strict way to avoid accepting values like '-123' as a valid
PIN.
Signed-hostap: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
unsigned int wps_pin_checksum(unsigned int pin);
unsigned int wps_pin_valid(unsigned int pin);
unsigned int wps_generate_pin(void);
+int wps_pin_str_valid(const char *pin);
void wps_free_pending_msgs(struct upnp_pending_message *msgs);
struct oob_device_data * wps_get_oob_device(char *device_type);
}
+int wps_pin_str_valid(const char *pin)
+{
+ const char *p;
+ size_t len;
+
+ p = pin;
+ while (*p >= '0' && *p <= '9')
+ p++;
+ if (*p != '\0')
+ return 0;
+
+ len = p - pin;
+ return len == 4 || len == 8;
+}
+
+
void wps_fail_event(struct wps_context *wps, enum wps_msg_type msg,
u16 config_error, u16 error_indication)
{
} else if (os_strncmp(pos, "pbc", 3) == 0) {
wps_method = WPS_PBC;
} else {
- char *end;
- long int val;
-
pin = pos;
pos = os_strchr(pin, ' ');
wps_method = WPS_PIN_KEYPAD;
if (os_strncmp(pos, "display", 7) == 0)
wps_method = WPS_PIN_DISPLAY;
}
- val = strtol(pin, &end, 10);
- if (val < 0 || (os_strlen(pin) != 4 && os_strlen(pin) != 8) ||
- *end != '\0') {
+ if (!wps_pin_str_valid(pin)) {
os_memcpy(buf, "FAIL-INVALID-PIN\n", 17);
return 17;
}