In r10-7816, cp_tree_equal/TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR was changed to use
comp_template_args to compare the targs. This makes sense, but
comp_template_args won't deal with an error_mark_node. We created
a BASELINK for S::foo<T::value_type>, but since value_type couldn't
be looked up, we ended up with an error_mark_node instead of a TREE_VEC
of arguments for the TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR in the BASELINK.
It seems reasonable not to create such a TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR by checking
the result of tsubst_template_args like we do in so many other places.
This changes the diagnostic in three tests, but it's only the followup
error message after complaining about the type/value mismatch.
PR c++/119580
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (tsubst_baselink): Return error_mark_node if
tsubst_template_args returned error_mark_node.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/crash106.C: Adjust expected diagnostics.
* g++.dg/template/crash112.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/template/dependent-args1.C: Likewise.
* g++.dg/cpp0x/pr119580.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
if (template_args)
template_args = tsubst_template_args (template_args, args,
complain, in_decl);
+ if (template_args == error_mark_node)
+ return error_mark_node;
}
tree binfo_type = BINFO_TYPE (BASELINK_BINFO (baselink));
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/119580
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<typename> struct V;
+template<typename> class C;
+class F;
+
+struct S {
+ template<typename>
+ static void foo ();
+ template<typename T, typename>
+ C<decltype(S::foo<T::value_type>)> foo ();
+ decltype(foo<V<F>>()) *a;
+};
+
+S s;
template<T> void foo(); // { dg-error "type" "" { target c++17_down } }
};
-template<T N = 0.0, void (A::*)() = &A::foo<N> > struct B {}; // { dg-error "type|declared|could not convert" "" { target c++17_down } }
+template<T N = 0.0, void (A::*)() = &A::foo<N> > struct B {}; // { dg-error "type|not a member" "" { target c++17_down } }
-B<> b; // { dg-message "" "" { target c++17_down } }
+B<> b; // { dg-error "invalid" "" { target c++17_down } }
template<int> struct C
{
- B<&A::foo<int int> > b; // { dg-error "declaration|type" }
+ B<&A::foo<int int> > b; // { dg-error "declaration|not a member" }
};
C<0> c;
-
-// { dg-prune-output "could not convert" }
template<int> void foo();
};
-template<int N, void (A::*)() = &A::foo<N> > struct B {};
+template<int N, void (A::*)() = &A::foo<N> > struct B {}; // { dg-error "not a member" }
-B<int> b; // { dg-error "type/value mismatch|expected a constant|invalid type" }
-
-// { dg-prune-output "(could not convert|no match)" }
+B<int> b; // { dg-error "type/value mismatch|invalid" }