(const_int 32)
(eq_attr "mode" "VNx1DI,VNx2DI,VNx4DI,VNx8DI,\
VNx1DF,VNx2DF,VNx4DF,VNx8DF")
- (const_int 64)
-
- (eq_attr "type" "vsetvl")
- (if_then_else (eq_attr "INSN_CODE (curr_insn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvldi
- || INSN_CODE (curr_insn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvlsi")
- (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[2])")
- (const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE))]
+ (const_int 64)]
(const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE)))
;; Ditto to LMUL.
(eq_attr "mode" "VNx4DI,VNx4DF")
(symbol_ref "riscv_vector::get_vlmul(E_VNx4DImode)")
(eq_attr "mode" "VNx8DI,VNx8DF")
- (symbol_ref "riscv_vector::get_vlmul(E_VNx8DImode)")
- (eq_attr "type" "vsetvl")
- (if_then_else (eq_attr "INSN_CODE (curr_insn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvldi
- || INSN_CODE (curr_insn) == CODE_FOR_vsetvlsi")
- (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[3])")
- (const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE))]
+ (symbol_ref "riscv_vector::get_vlmul(E_VNx8DImode)")]
(const_int INVALID_ATTRIBUTE)))
;; It is valid for instruction that require sew/lmul ratio.
"TARGET_VECTOR"
"vset%i1vli\t%0,%1,e%2,%m3,t%p4,m%p5"
[(set_attr "type" "vsetvl")
- (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
+ (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")
+ (set (attr "sew") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[2])"))
+ (set (attr "vlmul") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[3])"))
+ (set (attr "ta") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[4])"))
+ (set (attr "ma") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[5])"))])
;; vsetvl zero,zero,vtype instruction.
;; This pattern has no side effects and does not set X0 register.
"TARGET_VECTOR"
"vset%i0vli\tzero,%0,e%1,%m2,t%p3,m%p4"
[(set_attr "type" "vsetvl")
- (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")])
+ (set_attr "mode" "<MODE>")
+ (set (attr "sew") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[1])"))
+ (set (attr "vlmul") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[2])"))
+ (set (attr "ta") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[3])"))
+ (set (attr "ma") (symbol_ref "INTVAL (operands[4])"))])
;; It's emit by vsetvl/vsetvlmax intrinsics with no side effects.
;; Since we have many optmization passes from "expand" to "reload_completed",