When omr_source is 0x2, the omr_snoop (bit[6]) and omr_promoted (bit[7])
fields are combined to represent the snoop information. However, the
omr_promoted field was not left-shifted by 1 bit, resulting in incorrect
snoop information.
Besides, the snoop information parsing is not accurate for some OMR
sources, like the snoop information should be SNOOP_NONE for these memory
access (omr_source >= 7) instead of SNOOP_HIT.
Fix these issues.
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAP-5=fW4zLWFw1v38zCzB9-cseNSTTCtup=p2SDxZq7dPayVww@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: d2bdcde9626c ("perf/x86/intel: Add support for PEBS memory auxiliary info field in DMR")
Reported-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260311075201.2951073-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com
if (omr.omr_remote)
val |= REM;
- val |= omr.omr_hitm ? P(SNOOP, HITM) : P(SNOOP, HIT);
-
if (omr.omr_source == 0x2) {
- u8 snoop = omr.omr_snoop | omr.omr_promoted;
+ u8 snoop = omr.omr_snoop | (omr.omr_promoted << 1);
- if (snoop == 0x0)
+ if (omr.omr_hitm)
+ val |= P(SNOOP, HITM);
+ else if (snoop == 0x0)
val |= P(SNOOP, NA);
else if (snoop == 0x1)
val |= P(SNOOP, MISS);
else if (snoop == 0x3)
val |= P(SNOOP, NONE);
} else if (omr.omr_source > 0x2 && omr.omr_source < 0x7) {
+ val |= omr.omr_hitm ? P(SNOOP, HITM) : P(SNOOP, HIT);
val |= omr.omr_snoop ? P(SNOOPX, FWD) : 0;
+ } else {
+ val |= P(SNOOP, NONE);
}
return val;