The endpoints are managed in a list which was limited to 8 entries.
This limit can be too small in some cases: by having the same limit as
the number of subflows, it might not allow creating all expected
subflows when having a mix of v4 and v6 addresses that can all use MPTCP
on v4/v6 only networks.
While increasing the limit above the new subflows one, why not using the
technical limit: 255. Indeed, the endpoint will each have an ID that
will be used on the wire, limited to u8, and the ID 0 is reserved to the
initial subflow.
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260508-net-next-mptcp-pm-inc-limits-v1-4-c84e3fdf9b6a@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
*/
if (pernet->next_id == MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID)
pernet->next_id = 1;
- if (pernet->endpoints >= MPTCP_PM_ADDR_MAX) {
+ if (pernet->endpoints == MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID) {
ret = -ERANGE;
goto out;
}