Instead of simply treating a prefetch fault as spurious when there's a
shadow-present old SPTE, further check if the old SPTE is leaf to determine
if a prefetch fault is spurious.
It's not reasonable to treat a prefetch fault as spurious when there's a
shadow-present non-leaf SPTE without a corresponding shadow-present leaf
SPTE. e.g., in the following sequence, a prefetch fault should not be
considered spurious:
1. add a memslot with size 4K
2. prefault GPA A in the memslot
3. delete the memslot (zap all disabled)
4. re-add the memslot with size 2M
5. prefault GPA A again.
In step 5, the prefetch fault attempts to install a 2M huge entry.
Since step 3 zaps the leaf SPTE for GPA A while keeping the non-leaf SPTE,
the leaf entry will remain empty after step 5 if the fetch fault is
regarded as spurious due to a shadow-present non-leaf SPTE.
Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250318013111.5648-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
}
if (is_shadow_present_pte(*sptep)) {
- if (prefetch)
+ if (prefetch && is_last_spte(*sptep, level))
return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
/*
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sp->role.level != fault->goal_level))
return RET_PF_RETRY;
- if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte))
+ if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
+ is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&