Note that consensus-method is not a means for making backward-incompatible format changes. Because any point that confuses Roger will *definitely* confuse many non-Roger readers of dir-spec.txt ;)
svn:r12112
supported by more than 2/3 of the authorities voting. If it supports this
method, then it uses it. Otherwise, it falls back to method 1.
+ (The consensuses generated by new methods must be parsable by
+ implementations that only understand the old methods, and must not cause
+ those implementations to compromise their anonymity. This is a means for
+ making changes in the contents of consensus; not for making
+ backward-incompatible changes in their format.)
+
3.5. Detached signatures
Assuming full connectivity, every authority should compute and sign the