When init_expr is INTEGER_CST or REAL_CST, can_vec_perm_const_p is not
necessary since there's no real vec_perm needed, but
vec_gen_perm_mask_checked will gcc_assert (can_vec_perm_const_p). So
it's better to use vec_gen_perm_mask_any in
vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/106963
* tree-vect-loop.cc (vect_create_nonlinear_iv_init): Use
vec_gen_perm_mask_any instead of vec_gen_perm_mask_check.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/pr106963.c: New test.
--- /dev/null
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx -mno-avx2" } */
+
+void
+foo_neg_const (int *a)
+{
+ int i, b = 1;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
+ {
+ a[i] = b;
+ b = -b;
+ }
+}
sel[2 * i + 1] = i + nunits;
}
vec_perm_indices indices (sel, 2, nunits);
+ /* Don't use vect_gen_perm_mask_checked since can_vec_perm_const_p may
+ fail when vec_init is const vector. In that situation vec_perm is not
+ really needed. */
tree perm_mask_even
- = vect_gen_perm_mask_checked (vectype, indices);
+ = vect_gen_perm_mask_any (vectype, indices);
vec_init = gimple_build (stmts, VEC_PERM_EXPR,
vectype,
vec_init, vec_neg,