2.0.x patch: 2.2.x patch applies with offset.
+1: fuankg, wrowe, rjung
-PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
- [ please place SVN revisions from trunk here, so it is easy to
- identify exactly what the proposed changes are! Add all new
- proposals to the end of this list. ]
-
- * Backport 327179; PR 31226; allow ap_add_output_filters_by_type to handle
- proxied requests. Basic tests by jorton and [rpluem] show that this works,
- nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all
- (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint.
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179
- +0: covener, wrowe
- do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to
- backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism?
-
* Stupid-simple patch specific to give rotatelogs the same behavior
as the core log writer;
+1: wrowe, rjung, sf
if (nLogFD == NULL) {
/* Uh-oh. Failed to open the new log file. Try to clear
+ * mod_negotiation: PR 33112 - Fix for query string preservation after content negotiation
+ Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=915407
+ 2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=917017
+ Backport: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/pr-33112-2_0.patch
+ Revert r1002165 in test framework, once this is fixed.
+ +1: rjung, wrowe, sf
+
+ * mod_expires: Expires time shouldn't be in the past
+ Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=708902
+ 2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=713142
+ Backport: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/expires-in-the-past-2_0.patch
+ Revert r1002205 in test framework, once this is fixed.
+ +1: rjung, wrowe, sf
+
+PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
+ [ please place SVN revisions from trunk here, so it is easy to
+ identify exactly what the proposed changes are! Add all new
+ proposals to the end of this list. ]
+
+ * Backport 327179; PR 31226; allow ap_add_output_filters_by_type to handle
+ proxied requests. Basic tests by jorton and [rpluem] show that this works,
+ nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all
+ (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179
+ +0: covener, wrowe
+ do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to
+ backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism?
+
* pcre: update config.guess and config.sub for better platform support.
Trunk version of patch:
Does not apply.
Revert r1002110 and r1002161 in test framework, once this is fixed.
+1: rjung, wrowe
- * mod_negotiation: PR 33112 - Fix for query string preservation after content negotiation
- Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=915407
- 2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=917017
- Backport: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/pr-33112-2_0.patch
- Revert r1002165 in test framework, once this is fixed.
- +1: rjung, wrowe, sf
-
* mod_include: PR 39369 - Fix for query string preservation after content negotiation
Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=757376
2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=773352
Revert r1002174 in test framework, once this is fixed.
+1: rjung, wrowe
- * mod_expires: Expires time shouldn't be in the past
- Trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=708902
- 2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=713142
- Backport: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/expires-in-the-past-2_0.patch
- Revert r1002205 in test framework, once this is fixed.
- +1: rjung, wrowe, sf
-
PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON:
*) mod_headers: Support {...}s tag for SSL variable lookup.