Rewrite IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW case to avoid needing to add unreachable code
to work around a compiler warning.
When scoped_guard() was first introduced, compilers could not see when
it returned unconditionally from inside the hidden for loop. This has
since been fixed in the macro definition. So removing the `return
-EINVAL` should be enough. Still, we can improve readability, decrease
indentation and avoid the hidden for loop by rewriting the case without
scoped_guard().
Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
int ret;
switch (mask) {
- case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
- scoped_guard(mutex, &data->lock) {
- ret = ens210_get_measurement(
- indio_dev, channel->type == IIO_TEMP, val);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- return IIO_VAL_INT;
- }
- return -EINVAL; /* compiler warning workaround */
+ case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: {
+ guard(mutex)(&data->lock);
+
+ ret = ens210_get_measurement(indio_dev, channel->type == IIO_TEMP,
+ val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ return IIO_VAL_INT;
+ }
case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
if (channel->type == IIO_TEMP) {
*val = 15;