RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
- *) SECURITY:
-
-
*) SECURITY: CVE-2011-4317 (cve.mitre.org)
Resolve additional cases of URL rewriting with ProxyPassMatch or
RewriteRule, where particular request-URIs could result in undesired
identify exactly what the proposed changes are! Add all new
proposals to the end of this list. ]
- * Backport 327179; PR 31226; allow ap_add_output_filters_by_type to handle
- proxied requests. Basic tests by jorton and [rpluem] show that this works,
- nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all
- (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint.
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179
- +0: covener, wrowe
- do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to
- backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism?
-
* mod_ssl: Update default config (Cipher suite, commented SSLHonorCipherOrder
example, better MSIE version match)
PR 51363 and 49484.
2.2.x patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1227293
2.0.x patch: http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/2.0-ssl-conf.patch
+1: rjung
- -1:
+ -1: wrowe [it doesn't seem appropriate to add the alternate, less secure
+ template to a branch which people shouldn't be deploying in
+ the first place. I'm +1 on the -SSLv2 change alone.]
* mod_rewrite: (CVE-2013-1862 (cve.mitre.org)) Ensure that client data
written to the RewriteLog is escaped to prevent terminal escape sequences
PATCHES TO BACKPORT THAT ARE ON HOLD OR NOT GOING ANYWHERE SOON:
+ * Backport 327179; PR 31226; allow ap_add_output_filters_by_type to handle
+ proxied requests. Basic tests by jorton and [rpluem] show that this works,
+ nobody can actually remember why this limitation was introduced at all
+ (r94028) and the mailing list archives also gave no hint.
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=327179
+ +0: covener, wrowe
+ do we need to make people opt-in for this behavior to
+ backport it to 2.0.x? What mechanism?
+
*) mod_headers: Support {...}s tag for SSL variable lookup.
http://www.apache.org/~jorton/mod_headers-2.0-ssl.diff
+1: jorton, trawick