--- /dev/null
+From 8bad28d8a305b0e5ae444c8c3051e8744f5a4296 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
+Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:19:36 +0800
+Subject: io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling io_run_task_work*
+
+From: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
+
+commit 8bad28d8a305b0e5ae444c8c3051e8744f5a4296 upstream.
+
+Abaci reported the below issue:
+[ 141.400455] hrtimer: interrupt took 205853 ns
+[ 189.869316] process 'usr/local/ilogtail/ilogtail_0.16.26' started with executable stack
+[ 250.188042]
+[ 250.188327] ============================================
+[ 250.189015] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
+[ 250.189732] 5.11.0-rc4 #1 Not tainted
+[ 250.190267] --------------------------------------------
+[ 250.190917] a.out/7363 is trying to acquire lock:
+[ 250.191506] ffff888114dbcbe8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.192599]
+[ 250.192599] but task is already holding lock:
+[ 250.193309] ffff888114dbfbe8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __x64_sys_io_uring_register+0xad/0x210
+[ 250.194426]
+[ 250.194426] other info that might help us debug this:
+[ 250.195238] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
+[ 250.195238]
+[ 250.196019] CPU0
+[ 250.196411] ----
+[ 250.196803] lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+[ 250.197420] lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+[ 250.197966]
+[ 250.197966] *** DEADLOCK ***
+[ 250.197966]
+[ 250.198837] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
+[ 250.198837]
+[ 250.199780] 1 lock held by a.out/7363:
+[ 250.200373] #0: ffff888114dbfbe8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __x64_sys_io_uring_register+0xad/0x210
+[ 250.201645]
+[ 250.201645] stack backtrace:
+[ 250.202298] CPU: 0 PID: 7363 Comm: a.out Not tainted 5.11.0-rc4 #1
+[ 250.203144] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
+[ 250.203887] Call Trace:
+[ 250.204302] dump_stack+0xac/0xe3
+[ 250.204804] __lock_acquire+0xab6/0x13a0
+[ 250.205392] lock_acquire+0x2c3/0x390
+[ 250.205928] ? __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.206541] __mutex_lock+0xae/0x9f0
+[ 250.207071] ? __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.207745] ? 0xffffffffa0006083
+[ 250.208248] ? __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.208845] ? __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.209452] ? __io_req_task_submit+0x5/0xa0
+[ 250.210083] __io_req_task_submit+0x29/0xa0
+[ 250.210687] io_async_task_func+0x23d/0x4c0
+[ 250.211278] task_work_run+0x89/0xd0
+[ 250.211884] io_run_task_work_sig+0x50/0xc0
+[ 250.212464] io_sqe_files_unregister+0xb2/0x1f0
+[ 250.213109] __io_uring_register+0x115a/0x1750
+[ 250.213718] ? __x64_sys_io_uring_register+0xad/0x210
+[ 250.214395] ? __fget_files+0x15a/0x260
+[ 250.214956] __x64_sys_io_uring_register+0xbe/0x210
+[ 250.215620] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x46/0x110
+[ 250.216205] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40
+[ 250.216731] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
+[ 250.217455] RIP: 0033:0x7f0fa17e5239
+[ 250.218034] Code: 01 00 48 81 c4 80 00 00 00 e9 f1 fe ff ff 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 27 ec 2c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
+[ 250.220343] RSP: 002b:00007f0fa1eeac48 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001ab
+[ 250.221360] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f0fa17e5239
+[ 250.222272] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 0000000000000008
+[ 250.223185] RBP: 00007f0fa1eeae20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
+[ 250.224091] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
+[ 250.224999] R13: 0000000000021000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007f0fa1eeb700
+
+This is caused by calling io_run_task_work_sig() to do work under
+uring_lock while the caller io_sqe_files_unregister() already held
+uring_lock.
+To fix this issue, briefly drop uring_lock when calling
+io_run_task_work_sig(), and there are two things to concern:
+
+- hold uring_lock in io_ring_ctx_free() around io_sqe_files_unregister()
+ this is for consistency of lock/unlock.
+- add new fixed rsrc ref node before dropping uring_lock
+ it's not safe to do io_uring_enter-->percpu_ref_get() with a dying one.
+- check if rsrc_data->refs is dying to avoid parallel io_sqe_files_unregister
+
+Reported-by: Abaci <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
+Fixes: 1ffc54220c44 ("io_uring: fix io_sqe_files_unregister() hangs")
+Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
+Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
+[axboe: fixes from Pavel folded in]
+Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
+Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
+Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
+---
+ fs/io_uring.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
+ 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/fs/io_uring.c
++++ b/fs/io_uring.c
+@@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ struct fixed_file_data {
+ struct completion done;
+ struct list_head ref_list;
+ spinlock_t lock;
++ bool quiesce;
+ };
+
+ struct io_buffer {
+@@ -7105,41 +7106,79 @@ static void io_sqe_files_set_node(struct
+ percpu_ref_get(&file_data->refs);
+ }
+
+-static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
+-{
+- struct fixed_file_data *data = ctx->file_data;
+- struct fixed_file_ref_node *backup_node, *ref_node = NULL;
+- unsigned nr_tables, i;
+- int ret;
+
+- if (!data)
+- return -ENXIO;
+- backup_node = alloc_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx);
+- if (!backup_node)
+- return -ENOMEM;
++static void io_sqe_files_kill_node(struct fixed_file_data *data)
++{
++ struct fixed_file_ref_node *ref_node = NULL;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&data->lock);
+ ref_node = data->node;
+ spin_unlock_bh(&data->lock);
+ if (ref_node)
+ percpu_ref_kill(&ref_node->refs);
++}
++
++static int io_file_ref_quiesce(struct fixed_file_data *data,
++ struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
++{
++ int ret;
++ struct fixed_file_ref_node *backup_node;
+
+- percpu_ref_kill(&data->refs);
++ if (data->quiesce)
++ return -ENXIO;
+
+- /* wait for all refs nodes to complete */
+- flush_delayed_work(&ctx->file_put_work);
++ data->quiesce = true;
+ do {
++ backup_node = alloc_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx);
++ if (!backup_node)
++ break;
++
++ io_sqe_files_kill_node(data);
++ percpu_ref_kill(&data->refs);
++ flush_delayed_work(&ctx->file_put_work);
++
+ ret = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&data->done);
+ if (!ret)
+ break;
++
++ percpu_ref_resurrect(&data->refs);
++ io_sqe_files_set_node(data, backup_node);
++ backup_node = NULL;
++ reinit_completion(&data->done);
++ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ ret = io_run_task_work_sig();
+- if (ret < 0) {
+- percpu_ref_resurrect(&data->refs);
+- reinit_completion(&data->done);
+- io_sqe_files_set_node(data, backup_node);
+- return ret;
+- }
++ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
++
++ if (ret < 0)
++ break;
++ backup_node = alloc_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx);
++ ret = -ENOMEM;
++ if (!backup_node)
++ break;
+ } while (1);
++ data->quiesce = false;
++
++ if (backup_node)
++ destroy_fixed_file_ref_node(backup_node);
++ return ret;
++}
++
++static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
++{
++ struct fixed_file_data *data = ctx->file_data;
++ unsigned nr_tables, i;
++ int ret;
++
++ /*
++ * percpu_ref_is_dying() is to stop parallel files unregister
++ * Since we possibly drop uring lock later in this function to
++ * run task work.
++ */
++ if (!data || percpu_ref_is_dying(&data->refs))
++ return -ENXIO;
++ ret = io_file_ref_quiesce(data, ctx);
++ if (ret)
++ return ret;
+
+ __io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
+ nr_tables = DIV_ROUND_UP(ctx->nr_user_files, IORING_MAX_FILES_TABLE);
+@@ -7150,7 +7189,6 @@ static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struc
+ kfree(data);
+ ctx->file_data = NULL;
+ ctx->nr_user_files = 0;
+- destroy_fixed_file_ref_node(backup_node);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+@@ -8444,7 +8482,9 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_r
+ css_put(ctx->sqo_blkcg_css);
+ #endif
+
++ mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
++ mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
+ io_eventfd_unregister(ctx);
+ io_destroy_buffers(ctx);
+