The comparison
rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
has a signed left-hand side and an unsigned right-hand side.
So the comparison might become true for negative start_secs which is
interpreted as a (possibly very large) positive value.
As a negative value can never be bigger than an unsigned value
the correct representation of the (mathematical) comparison
rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
in C is:
rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max
Use that to fix the offset calculation currently used in the
rtc-mt6397 driver.
Fixes: 989515647e783 ("rtc: Add one offset seconds to expand RTC range")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250428-enable-rtc-v4-2-2b2f7e3f9349@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
*
* Otherwise the offset seconds should be 0.
*/
- if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max ||
+ if ((rtc->start_secs >= 0 && rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_max) ||
rtc->start_secs + range_secs - 1 < rtc->range_min)
rtc->offset_secs = rtc->start_secs - rtc->range_min;
else if (rtc->start_secs > rtc->range_min)