From: Eric Botcazou Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 10:58:55 +0000 (+0100) Subject: ada: Fix assertion failure on illegal use of aspect Type_Invariant X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-16~4399 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0362d7aa8fcdb63505a6b37a36fc7cc5845ba80c;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git ada: Fix assertion failure on illegal use of aspect Type_Invariant The illegal use is on a type derived from a formal private type, e.g.: generic type T is private; package G is type D is new T with Type_Invariant => True; end G; gcc/ada/ChangeLog: PR ada/113037 * sem_prag.adb (Analyze_Pragma) : Reject types that are derived from formal private types. --- diff --git a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb index f4ae89fd2e7a..ef9039652321 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/sem_prag.adb @@ -19773,18 +19773,26 @@ package body Sem_Prag is -- An invariant must apply to a private type, or appear in the -- private part of a package spec and apply to a completion. - -- a class-wide invariant can only appear on a private declaration + -- A class-wide invariant can only appear on a private declaration -- or private extension, not a completion. - -- A [class-wide] invariant may be associated a [limited] private - -- type or a private extension. + -- A [class-wide] invariant may be associated with a [limited] + -- private type. We need to explicitly exclude types that are + -- derived from formal private types here. elsif Ekind (Typ) in E_Limited_Private_Type | E_Private_Type - | E_Record_Type_With_Private + and then not (Is_Derived_Type (Typ) + and then Is_Generic_Type (Etype (Typ))) then null; + -- A [class-wide] invariant may be associated with a private + -- extension. + + elsif Ekind (Typ) = E_Record_Type_With_Private then + null; + -- A non-class-wide invariant may be associated with the full view -- of a [limited] private type or a private extension.