From: Cristian Ciocaltea Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:20:49 +0000 (+0200) Subject: phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Use usleep_range() instead of udelay() X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0ef8dd1034e3656e40d020911bb7aa14e7084663;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git phy: rockchip: samsung-hdptx: Use usleep_range() instead of udelay() rk_hdptx_dp_reset() is allowed to sleep, hence replace the busy waiting with usleep_range(), to allow other threads to run. Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260113-phy-hdptx-frl-v6-2-8d5f97419c0b@collabora.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul --- diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c index a65e96694237..89710066d70c 100644 --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-samsung-hdptx.c @@ -1042,7 +1042,7 @@ static void rk_hdptx_dp_reset(struct rk_hdptx_phy *hdptx) reset_control_assert(hdptx->rsts[RST_INIT].rstc); reset_control_assert(hdptx->rsts[RST_APB].rstc); - udelay(10); + usleep_range(10, 15); reset_control_deassert(hdptx->rsts[RST_APB].rstc); regmap_update_bits(hdptx->regmap, LANE_REG(0301),