From: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 20:40:16 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime
X-Git-Tag: v7.2-rc2~22^2~38
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=16759757c4d28e958fd5a5a1fe0f86828872f28d;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git

net: pse-pd: scope pse_control regulator handle to kref lifetime

__pse_control_release() drops psec->ps via devm_regulator_put(), which
only succeeds if the devres entry added by the matching
devm_regulator_get_exclusive() is still present on pcdev->dev at the
time the pse_control's kref hits zero.

That assumption does not hold when the controller is unbound while a
pse_control still has consumers: pcdev->dev's devres list is released
LIFO, so every per-attach regulator-GET devres runs (and
regulator_put()s the underlying regulator) before
pse_controller_unregister() itself is invoked. Any later
pse_control_put() from that unbind path then reads psec->ps as a
dangling pointer inside devm_regulator_put() and WARNs at
drivers/regulator/devres.c:232 (devres_release() fails to find the
already-released match).

The pse_control's consumer handle is logically scoped to the
pse_control's refcount, not to pcdev->dev's devres lifetime. Switch to
the plain regulator_get_exclusive() / regulator_put() pair so the
regulator put in __pse_control_release() no longer depends on the
controller's devres still being present. No change to the
regulator-framework-visible refcount or lifetime of the underlying
regulator: a single get paired with a single put. The existing
devm_regulator_register() for the per-PI rails is unchanged (those ARE
correctly scoped to the controller's lifetime).

This addresses only the regulator handle. The same unbind-while-held
scenario also leaves __pse_control_release() reading psec->pcdev->pi[]
and psec->pcdev->owner after pse_controller_unregister() has freed
pcdev->pi, because the controller does not drain its outstanding
pse_control references on unregister. That wider pse_control vs
pcdev lifetime problem pre-dates this change and is addressed by the
PSE controller notifier series, which drains phydev->psec on
PSE_UNREGISTERED before pcdev->pi is freed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260620112440.1734404-1-github@szelinsky.de/
Fixes: d83e13761d5b ("net: pse-pd: Use regulator framework within PSE framework")
Signed-off-by: Corey Leavitt <corey@leavitt.info>
Acked-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Szelinsky <github@szelinsky.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260624204017.2752934-1-github@szelinsky.de
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
index 69dbdbde9d71a..a5e6d7b26b9fd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c
@@ -1367,7 +1367,7 @@ static void __pse_control_release(struct kref *kref)
 
 	if (psec->pcdev->pi[psec->id].admin_state_enabled)
 		regulator_disable(psec->ps);
-	devm_regulator_put(psec->ps);
+	regulator_put(psec->ps);
 
 	module_put(psec->pcdev->owner);
 
@@ -1436,8 +1436,8 @@ pse_control_get_internal(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev, unsigned int index,
 		goto free_psec;
 
 	pcdev->pi[index].admin_state_enabled = ret;
-	psec->ps = devm_regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
-						rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
+	psec->ps = regulator_get_exclusive(pcdev->dev,
+					   rdev_get_name(pcdev->pi[index].rdev));
 	if (IS_ERR(psec->ps)) {
 		ret = PTR_ERR(psec->ps);
 		goto put_module;