From: Richard Purdie Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 12:03:07 +0000 (+0100) Subject: lzo: Add further info to a patch and mark as Inactive-Upstream X-Git-Tag: uninative-3.7~716 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=241309c6dec364445093fa5973cc8998431cbed9;p=thirdparty%2Fopenembedded%2Fopenembedded-core.git lzo: Add further info to a patch and mark as Inactive-Upstream Add some further info to the patch based on upstream changes. Given the last release in 2017 and glaring issues on at least armv5, it does raise the question on whether we should drop this. There are probably better compression tools now. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch index db3a70e8031..a0d2502d24d 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch +++ b/meta/recipes-support/lzo/lzo/0001-Use-memcpy-instead-of-reinventing-it.patch @@ -10,7 +10,15 @@ Change suggested by Julian Taylor. Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757037 -Upstream-Status: Pending +RP: Patch is still in debian as of 20220524 in a revised form: +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/ +https://sources.debian.org/patches/lzo2/2.10-2/0001-Conditionally-replace-reinvention-of-memcpy-with-cal.patch/ +It was submitted in 2015, no reply to an email from RP in 2022 either. + +We likely need this in OE to prevent against unaligned accesses +on systems such as armv5. + +Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream Signed-off-by: Saul Wold --- minilzo/minilzo.c | 14 ++++++++++++++