From: Martin Jansa Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2025 07:54:28 +0000 (+0100) Subject: cross.bbclass: Propagate dependencies to outhash X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=267b651e875d9381a23ffd5757d426714c029409;p=thirdparty%2Fopenembedded%2Fopenembedded-core-contrib.git cross.bbclass: Propagate dependencies to outhash Similar to what native and staging is doing since: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/native.bbclass?id=d6c7b9f4f0e61fa6546d3644e27abe3e96f597e2 https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/meta/classes/staging.bbclass?id=1cf62882bbac543960e4815d117ffce0e53bda07 Cross task outputs can call native dependencies and even when cross recipe output doesn't change it might produce different results when the called native dependency is changed, e.g. clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} contains symlink to clang binary from clang-native, but when clang-native outhash is changed, clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} will still be considered equivalent and target recipes aren't rebuilt with new clang binary, see work around in https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/pull/1140 to make target recipes to depend directly not only on clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} but clang-native as well. I have added a small testcase in meta-selftest which demostrates this issue. Not included in this change, but will send it if useful. openembedded-core $ ls -1 meta-selftest/recipes-devtools/hashequiv-test/ print-datetime-link-cross.bb print-datetime-link-native.bb print-datetime-native.bb print-datetime-usecross.bb print-datetime-usenative.bb print-datetime-native provides script which prints defined PRINT_DATETIME variable. print-datetime-link-native and print-datetime-link-cross both provide a symlink to the script from print-datetime-native. print-datetime-usenative and print-datetime-usecross are target recipes using the native and cross versions of print-datetime-link-* recipe. # clean build all is rebuilt: $ bitbake -k print-datetime-usenative print-datetime-usecross WARNING: print-datetime-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-native current DATETIME in script is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-link-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-native current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-usenative-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usenative current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_05 WARNING: print-datetime-usecross-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usecross current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_05 # keep sstate-cache and hashserv.db: # print-datetime-usenative is correctly rebuilt, because print-datetime-link-native has different hash (because print-datetime-native hash changed) # print-datetime-usecross wasn't rebuilt, because print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 doesn't include the changed hash of print-datetime-native $ bitbake -k print-datetime-usenative print-datetime-usecross WARNING: print-datetime-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-native current DATETIME in script is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-link-native-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-native current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 current DATETIME in symlink is 2025-11-13_20_07 WARNING: print-datetime-usenative-1.0-r0 do_install: print-datetime-usenative current DATETIME from print-datetime-link is 2025-11-13_20_07 It's because print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 depsig doesn't include print-datetime-native signature: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64:x86_64-oe-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 32 19fbeb373f781c2504453c1ca04dab018a7bc8388c87f4bbc59589df31523d07 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/print-datetime-link -> ../print-datetime While print-datetime-link-native doesn't have this issue, because print-datetime-native signature is there: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-native/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 print-datetime-native: 60f2734a63d708489570ca719413b4662f8368abc9f4760a279a0a5481e4a17b quilt-native: 65d78a7a5b5cbbf0969798efe558ca28e7ef058f4232fcff266912d16f67a8b8 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-native:x86_64-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 26 3d5458be834b2d0e4c65466b9b877d6028ae2210a56399284a23144818666f10 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/print-datetime-link -> print-datetime With the cross.bbclass fix the link-cross recipe has a checksum from native recipe as well: $ cat tmp/work/x86_64-linux/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64/1.0/temp/depsig.do_populate_sysroot OEOuthashBasic 18 print-datetime-native: 9ceb6c27342eae6b8da86c84685af38fb8927ccc19979aae75b8b1e444b11c5c quilt-native: 65d78a7a5b5cbbf0969798efe558ca28e7ef058f4232fcff266912d16f67a8b8 SSTATE_PKGSPEC=sstate:print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64:x86_64-oe-linux:1.0:r0:x86_64:14: task=populate_sysroot drwx . drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers -rw- 32 19fbeb373f781c2504453c1ca04dab018a7bc8388c87f4bbc59589df31523d07 ./recipe-sysroot-native/sysroot-providers/print-datetime-link-cross-x86_64 drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin drwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux lrwx ./recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/print-datetime-link -> ../print-datetime And print-datetime-usecross is correctly rebuilt whenever print-datetime-native output is different. Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Signed-off-by: Mathieu Dubois-Briand Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/cross.bbclass b/meta/classes-recipe/cross.bbclass index 9abf166e50c..c3eeade67b8 100644 --- a/meta/classes-recipe/cross.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/cross.bbclass @@ -101,3 +101,39 @@ addtask addto_recipe_sysroot after do_populate_sysroot do_addto_recipe_sysroot[deptask] = "do_populate_sysroot" PATH:prepend = "${COREBASE}/scripts/cross-intercept:" + +# +# Cross task outputs can call native dependencies and even when cross +# recipe output doesn't change it might produce different results when +# the called native dependency is changed, e.g. clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} +# contains symlink to clang binary from clang-native, but when clang-native +# outhash is changed, clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} will still be considered +# equivalent and target recipes aren't rebuilt with new clang binary, see +# work around in https://github.com/kraj/meta-clang/pull/1140 to make target +# recipes to depend directly not only on clang-cross-${TARGET_ARCH} but +# clang-native as well. +# +# This can cause poor interactions with hash equivalence, since this recipes +# output-changing dependency is "hidden" and downstream task only see that this +# recipe has the same outhash and therefore is equivalent. This can result in +# different output in different cases. +# +# To resolve this, unhide the output-changing dependency by adding its unihash +# to this tasks outhash calculation. Unfortunately, don't know specifically +# know which dependencies are output-changing, so we have to add all of them. +# +python cross_add_do_populate_sysroot_deps () { + current_task = "do_" + d.getVar("BB_CURRENTTASK") + if current_task != "do_populate_sysroot": + return + + taskdepdata = d.getVar("BB_TASKDEPDATA", False) + pn = d.getVar("PN") + deps = { + dep[0]:dep[6] for dep in taskdepdata.values() if + dep[1] == current_task and dep[0] != pn + } + + d.setVar("HASHEQUIV_EXTRA_SIGDATA", "\n".join("%s: %s" % (k, deps[k]) for k in sorted(deps.keys()))) +} +SSTATECREATEFUNCS += "cross_add_do_populate_sysroot_deps"