From: Ju-Zhe Zhong Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:56:43 +0000 (+0800) Subject: RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn * [NFC] X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-14~1794 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=27a2a4b6ed36784cc44e33451eed602f93ef3488;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn * [NFC] Since the PASS is implemented base on RTL_SSA framework. According to rtl_ssa, they name insn_info * as insn and name rtx_insn * rinsn. I follow this rule in this pass but I missed this function. So rename it to make codes be consistent to RTL_SSA framework. gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (add_label_notes): Rename insn to rinsn. --- diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc index f9dd7ca81ba0..4c78e58cc28f 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc @@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ insert_vsetvl (enum emit_type emit_type, rtx_insn *rinsn, necessary REG_LABEL_OPERAND and REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ static void -add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) +add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *rinsn) { enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (x); int i, j; @@ -700,8 +700,8 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) /* There's no reason for current users to emit jump-insns with such a LABEL_REF, so we don't have to handle REG_LABEL_TARGET notes. */ - gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (insn)); - add_reg_note (insn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); + gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (rinsn)); + add_reg_note (rinsn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x)); if (LABEL_P (label_ref_label (x))) LABEL_NUSES (label_ref_label (x))++; @@ -712,10 +712,10 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn) for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1, fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code); i >= 0; i--) { if (fmt[i] == 'e') - add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), insn); + add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), rinsn); else if (fmt[i] == 'E') for (j = XVECLEN (x, i) - 1; j >= 0; j--) - add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), insn); + add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), rinsn); } }