From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:57:59 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Stop claiming inlining and loop unrolling do not... 
X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-4.4.0~571
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=28c11eb39b17d2c0a9eca41e69af9777ee8cdd60;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git

invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Stop claiming inlining and loop unrolling do not happen at -O2.

	* doc/invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Stop claiming inlining and
	loop unrolling do not happen at -O2.

From-SVN: r144123
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 2ad904d0d653..d0f7127ee23d 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2009-02-12  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>
+
+	* doc/invoke.texi (Optimize Options): Stop claiming inlining and
+	loop unrolling do not happen at -O2.
+
 2009-02-12  Michael Matz  <matz@suse.de>
 
 	* gcc.c (ASM_DEBUG_SPEC): Check for -g0.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index fb6739080ccb..46801ea3504c 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -5352,8 +5352,7 @@ where doing so does not interfere with debugging.
 @item -O2
 @opindex O2
 Optimize even more.  GCC performs nearly all supported optimizations
-that do not involve a space-speed tradeoff.  The compiler does not
-perform loop unrolling or function inlining when you specify @option{-O2}.
+that do not involve a space-speed tradeoff.
 As compared to @option{-O}, this option increases both compilation time
 and the performance of the generated code.