From: Harlan Stenn Listen carefully to what I say; it is very complicated. Last update:
- 25-Sep-2010 3:35
+ 29-Oct-2010 19:45
UTC Phase three uses an intersection algorithm to select the truechimers from
among the candidates, leaving behind the falsetickers. A server or peer configured
with the true option is ipso facto a truechimer independent of this
algorithm. Phase four uses a clustering algorithm to cast off statistical outliers
- from the truechimers until a set of survivors not less than the number specified
- as the minclock option of the tos command, with default 3. Phase five uses a set of algorithms and mitigation rules to rank the survivors to prodce combined statistics used to discipline the clock, as well as to select from among the survivors
+ from the truechimers until a set of survivors not less than minclock remain. The minclock has default 3, but can be changed with the minclock option of the tos command. Phase five uses a set of algorithms and mitigation rules to rank the survivors to produce combined statistics used to discipline the clock, as well as to select from among the survivors
a system peer from which a set of system statistics can be inherited and passed
- along to a dependent client population. The algorithms and rules are the main toopic of this page. The clock offset developed from these
+ along to a dependent client population. The algorithms and rules are the main topic of this page. The clock offset developed from these
algorithms can discipline the system clock either using the ntpd clock
discipline algorithm or enable the kernel to discipline the system clock directly,
as described on the A Kernel Model for Precision Timekeeping page.
Phase five is the topic of this page. The cluster algorithm produces a list of survivors ranked by increasing synchronization distance. The combine algorithm uses this list to produce a weighted average of both offset and jitter. Absent other considerations discussed later, the combined offset is used to discipline the clock, while the combined jitter is combined with other components to produce the system jitter statistic inherited by dependent clients. The combine algorithm uses a weight factor for each survivor computed as the select threshold minus the synchronization distance. Since the select algorithm refects candidates with synchronization distance greater than the select threshold, the weight factor is always positive. The system jitter is calculated as the RMS weighted differences between the offset of each survivor and the offset of the first candidate on the survivor list. Generally speaking, the best candidate for the system peer is the first candidate on the survivor list, as this has the smallest synchronization distance. However, it can cause some trauma in downstream clients when the system peer is changed frequectly, so some care is taken to insure that a change does not occur, unless to do so would materially improve quality. Frequently when there are two or more servers avaialbe with substantially the same synchronization distance, one or another will show up at the head of the survivor list followed closely by the others of substantially the same distance. The object of the anti-clockhop algorithm is to avoid reselecting the system peer unless it becomes stale or significally worse than the candidate at the head of the list. Previously, the algorithm has remembered the last selected system peer or whether there was none. In addition, the algorithm has initialized the anticlockhop threshold with the value of the mindisp statistic, by default 1 ms. To help compact this duscussion, we will call the last selected systm peer the old peer, and the peer at the head of the survivor peer the candidate peer. If there was no old peer or the old and candidate peers are the same, the candidate peer becomes the system peer. If not, the algorithm measures the difference between the offset of the old peer and candidate peer. If the difference exceeds the anticlockhop threshold, the candidate peer becomes the system peer and the anticlochop threshold restored to its original value. If not, the old peer continues as the system peer. However, at each subsequent call, the algorithm reduces the anticlockhop threshold by half. Should operation continue in this way, the canddate peer will eventually become the system peer. The anti-clockhop algorithm is most effective in cases where multiple primary servers are available on fast LANs with modern computers. Typical offset differences in such cases are less than 0.5 ms and clockhops are much less frequent than if the algorithm is not used.. The combine algorithm uses a weight factor for each survivor computed as the select threshold minus the synchronization distance. Since the select algorithm rejects candidates with synchronization distance greater than the select threshold, the weight factor is always positive. The system jitter is calculated as the RMS weighted differences between the offset of each survivor and the offset of the first candidate on the survivor list. Generally speaking, the best candidate for the system peer is the first candidate on the survivor list, as this has the smallest synchronization distance. However, it can cause some trauma in downstream clients when the system peer is changed frequently, so some care is taken to insure that a change does not occur, unless to do so would materially improve quality. Frequently when there are two or more servers available with substantially the same synchronization distance, one or another will show up at the head of the survivor list followed closely by the others of substantially the same distance. The object of the anti-clockhop algorithm is to avoid reselecting the system peer unless it becomes stale or significantly worse than the candidate at the head of the list. Previously, the algorithm has remembered the last selected system peer or whether there was none. In addition, the algorithm has initialized the anti-clockhop threshold with the value of the mindist statistic, by default 1 ms. To help compact this discussion, we will call the last selected system peer the old peer, and the peer at the head of the survivor peer the candidate peer. If there was no old peer or the old and candidate peers are the same, the candidate peer becomes the system peer. If not, the algorithm measures the difference between the offset of the old peer and candidate peer. If the difference exceeds the anti-clockhop threshold, the candidate peer becomes the system peer and the anti-clockhop threshold is restored to its original value. If not, the old peer continues as the system peer. However, at each subsequent call, the algorithm reduces the anti-clockhop threshold by half. Should operation continue in this way, the candidate peer will eventually become the system peer. The anti-clockhop algorithm is most effective in cases where multiple primary servers are available on fast LANs with modern computers. Typical offset differences in such cases are less than 0.5 ms and clockhops are much less frequent than if the algorithm is not used. The behavior of the various algorithms and mitigation rules involved depends on how the various synchronization sources are classified. This depends on whether the source is local or remote and if local the type of source. The following classes are defined: The mitigation rules are designed to provide an intelligent selection of the system peer from among the survivors of different types. When used with the server or peer commands, the prefer option designates one or more survivors as preferred over all others. While the rules do not forbid it, it is usually not useful to designate more than one source as preferred; however, if more than one source is so designated, they are used in the order specified in the configuration file; that is, if the first one becomes unselectable, the second one is considered and so forth. This order of priority is also applicable to multiple PPS drivers, multiple modem drivers and even multiple local drivers, although that would not normally be useful. The clustering algorithm works on the set of truechimers produced by the intersection algorithms. Ordinarily, any one of them can in principle provide correct time; however, due to various latency variations, not all can provide the most accurate and stable time. The clustering algorithm, processes the truechimers in one or more rounds to cast off a statistical outlier until no more than the minclock option of the tos command are left. The default for this option is 3. In the prefer scheme the clustering algorithm is modified so that the prefer peer is never discarded; on the contrary, its potential removal becomes a rounds-termination condition. However, the prefer peer can still be discarded by the intersection algorithm as a falseticker. To avoid this, it is usually wise to increase the mindist option of the tos command from the default .005 s to something like .05 s. In the prefer scheme the cluster algorithm is modified so that the prefer peer is never discarded; on the contrary, its potential removal becomes a rounds-termination condition. However, the prefer peer can still be discarded by the intersection algorithm as a falseticker. To avoid this, it is usually wise to increase the mindist option of the tos command from the default .005 s to something like .05 s. Ordinarily, the combining algorithm computes a weighted average of the survivor
offsets to produce the final synchronization source. However, if a prefer
peer is among the survivors, the combining algorithm is not used. Instead,
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@
signal, the GPS driver is designated the PPS driver and the PPS signal disciplines
the system clock. If no GPS satellites are in view, or if the PPS signal is
disconnected, the GPS driver stops updating the system clock and so eventually
- becomes unreachable and replaced by other sources..
from Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Lewis Carroll
Related Links
@@ -32,42 +32,41 @@
Combine Algorithm
Anti-Clockhp Algorityhm
-Anti-Clockhop Algorithm
+Peer Classification
The prefer Peer
Whether or not the GPS driver disables the PPS signal when unreachable is at the discretion of the driver. Ordinarily, the PPS signal would be disabled in this case; however, When the GPS receiver has a precision holdover oscillator, the driver may elect to continue PPS operation. In this case the PPS signal continues to discipline the system clock.