From: Hans de Goede Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:14:58 +0000 (+0100) Subject: ehci: Don't verify the next pointer for periodic qh-s and qtd-s X-Git-Tag: v1.3.0-rc0~7^2~6 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2c7b15c1dec4b2ec17549c760df0b7a7cea3ed7d;p=thirdparty%2Fqemu.git ehci: Don't verify the next pointer for periodic qh-s and qtd-s While testing the move to async packet handling for interrupt endpoints I noticed that Windows-XP likes to play tricks with the next pointer for periodic qh-s, so we should not fail qh / qtd verification when it changes. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann --- diff --git a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c index 89b7520c075..287a066d0a4 100644 --- a/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c +++ b/hw/usb/hcd-ehci.c @@ -1550,8 +1550,10 @@ static EHCIQueue *ehci_state_fetchqh(EHCIState *ehci, int async) endp = get_field(qh.epchar, QH_EPCHAR_EP); if ((devaddr != get_field(q->qh.epchar, QH_EPCHAR_DEVADDR)) || (endp != get_field(q->qh.epchar, QH_EPCHAR_EP)) || - (memcmp(&qh.current_qtd, &q->qh.current_qtd, - 9 * sizeof(uint32_t)) != 0) || + (qh.current_qtd != q->qh.current_qtd) || + (q->async && qh.next_qtd != q->qh.next_qtd) || + (memcmp(&qh.altnext_qtd, &q->qh.altnext_qtd, + 7 * sizeof(uint32_t)) != 0) || (q->dev != NULL && q->dev->addr != devaddr)) { if (ehci_reset_queue(q) > 0) { ehci_trace_guest_bug(ehci, "guest updated active QH"); @@ -1719,7 +1721,8 @@ static int ehci_state_fetchqtd(EHCIQueue *q) p = QTAILQ_FIRST(&q->packets); if (p != NULL) { if (p->qtdaddr != q->qtdaddr || - (!NLPTR_TBIT(p->qtd.next) && (p->qtd.next != qtd.next)) || + (q->async && !NLPTR_TBIT(p->qtd.next) && + (p->qtd.next != qtd.next)) || (!NLPTR_TBIT(p->qtd.altnext) && (p->qtd.altnext != qtd.altnext)) || p->qtd.bufptr[0] != qtd.bufptr[0]) { ehci_cancel_queue(q);