From: Lifeng Zheng Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 11:30:56 +0000 (+0800) Subject: cpufreq: CPPC: Do not return a value from populate_efficiency_class() X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3d5978ea6cbc4df192d0ea1800ef5d55b28b965e;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git cpufreq: CPPC: Do not return a value from populate_efficiency_class() The return value of populate_efficiency_class() is never needed and the result of it doesn't affect the initialization of cppc_cpufreq. It makes more sense to change it into a void function. Signed-off-by: Lifeng Zheng Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250526113057.3086513-3-zhenglifeng1@huawei.com [ rjw: Subject and changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index f3b5ea9fcbf51..c2be4b188a237 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static int cppc_get_cpu_cost(struct device *cpu_dev, unsigned long KHz, return 0; } -static int populate_efficiency_class(void) +static void populate_efficiency_class(void) { struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *gicc; DECLARE_BITMAP(used_classes, 256) = {}; @@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ static int populate_efficiency_class(void) if (bitmap_weight(used_classes, 256) <= 1) { pr_debug("Efficiency classes are all equal (=%d). " "No EM registered", class); - return -EINVAL; + return; } /* @@ -512,8 +512,6 @@ static int populate_efficiency_class(void) index++; } cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em; - - return 0; } static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) @@ -529,9 +527,8 @@ static void cppc_cpufreq_register_em(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) } #else -static int populate_efficiency_class(void) +static void populate_efficiency_class(void) { - return 0; } #endif