From: Willy Tarreau Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 07:59:06 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Revert "ipc/sem.c: optimize sem_lock()" X-Git-Tag: v3.10.105~38 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3d971ee18fe6ca21b722ce2c7e7a1d834d60929b;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git Revert "ipc/sem.c: optimize sem_lock()" This reverts commit 901f6fedc5340d66e2ca67c70dfee926cb5a1ea0 (upstream commit 6d07b68ce16ae9535955ba2059dedba5309c3ca1). As suggested in commit 5864a2fd3088db73d47942370d0f7210a807b9bc (ipc/sem.c: fix complex_count vs. simple op race) since it introduces a regression and the candidate fix requires too many changes for 3.10. Cc: Manfred Spraul Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau --- diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c index 47a15192b8b87..3b968a028ccf1 100644 --- a/ipc/sem.c +++ b/ipc/sem.c @@ -267,20 +267,12 @@ static void sem_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head) * Caller must own sem_perm.lock. * New simple ops cannot start, because simple ops first check * that sem_perm.lock is free. - * that a) sem_perm.lock is free and b) complex_count is 0. */ static void sem_wait_array(struct sem_array *sma) { int i; struct sem *sem; - if (sma->complex_count) { - /* The thread that increased sma->complex_count waited on - * all sem->lock locks. Thus we don't need to wait again. - */ - return; - } - for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++) { sem = sma->sem_base + i; spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);