From: Robbie Harwood Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:31:22 +0000 (-0400) Subject: Exit with status 0 from kadmind X-Git-Tag: krb5-1.17-beta1~167 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3e53f7b254c6704ad16942f98d9b222c9e069ef3;p=thirdparty%2Fkrb5.git Exit with status 0 from kadmind Typically, 0 denotes successful exit. In particular, init systems will complain if another different value is returned. This presents a problem for automated installation jobs which want to restart kadmind. `service kadmin stop` typically sends SIGTERM, which is caught by verto and passed to our handler. Besides cleanup, we then call verto_break(), which causes the verto_run() event loop to return. The weird return code has been present since the addition of the kadmin code, which used a similar event model for signals. ticket: 8650 (new) --- diff --git a/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c b/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c index 6c875901a9..936955b899 100644 --- a/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c +++ b/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c @@ -560,5 +560,5 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) krb5_klog_close(context); krb5_free_context(context); - exit(2); + exit(0); }