From: Hans-Peter Nilsson Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:46:05 +0000 (+0100) Subject: testsuite: Xfail gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c for ! natural_alignment_32 X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-14~368 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3fbeff66684d95417646aaa22d0a8f1ec9786299;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git testsuite: Xfail gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c for ! natural_alignment_32 The test gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c fails the scan-tree-dump-not fre1 "baz" for at least m68k-linux, pru-elf, and cris-elf according to posts on gcc-testresults. GCC requires int-size-alignment for a target to see through the "int *" dereference and perform value-numbering. See comments in PR91419 and also the recent patch to gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr100359.c. This is a flaw in gcc rather than the target, so prefer an xfail rather than skipping the test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c: XFAIL for ! natural_alignment_32. --- diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c index ead76548f3df..1b6a3a398a4e 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c @@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ void foo (int *p, int n) while (--n); } -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "baz" "fre1" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "baz" "fre1" { xfail { ! natural_alignment_32 } } } } */