From: Bobby Eshleman Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2026 00:32:56 +0000 (-0800) Subject: net: devmem: use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE on binding->dev X-Git-Tag: v7.0-rc3~39^2~16 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=40bf00ec2ee271df5ba67593991760adf8b5d0ed;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git net: devmem: use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE on binding->dev binding->dev is protected on the write-side in mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall() against concurrent writes, but due to the concurrent bare reads in net_devmem_get_binding() and validate_xmit_unreadable_skb() it should be wrapped in a READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE pair to make sure no compiler optimizations play with the underlying register in unforeseen ways. Doesn't present a critical bug because the known compiler optimizations don't result in bad behavior. There is no tearing on u64, and load omissions/invented loads would only break if additional binding->dev references were inlined together (they aren't right now). This just more strictly follows the linux memory model (i.e., "Lock-Protected Writes With Lockless Reads" in tools/memory-model/Documentation/access-marking.txt). Fixes: bd61848900bf ("net: devmem: Implement TX path") Signed-off-by: Bobby Eshleman Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302-devmem-membar-fix-v2-1-5b33c9cbc28b@meta.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index 4af4cf2d63a4..20610a192ec7 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -3987,7 +3987,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *validate_xmit_unreadable_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, if (shinfo->nr_frags > 0) { niov = netmem_to_net_iov(skb_frag_netmem(&shinfo->frags[0])); if (net_is_devmem_iov(niov) && - net_devmem_iov_binding(niov)->dev != dev) + READ_ONCE(net_devmem_iov_binding(niov)->dev) != dev) goto out_free; } diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c index 8c9aad776bf4..69d79aee07ef 100644 --- a/net/core/devmem.c +++ b/net/core/devmem.c @@ -396,7 +396,8 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk, * net_device. */ dst_dev = dst_dev_rcu(dst); - if (unlikely(!dst_dev) || unlikely(dst_dev != binding->dev)) { + if (unlikely(!dst_dev) || + unlikely(dst_dev != READ_ONCE(binding->dev))) { err = -ENODEV; goto out_unlock; } @@ -513,7 +514,8 @@ static void mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall(void *mp_priv, xa_erase(&binding->bound_rxqs, xa_idx); if (xa_empty(&binding->bound_rxqs)) { mutex_lock(&binding->lock); - binding->dev = NULL; + ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(binding->dev); + WRITE_ONCE(binding->dev, NULL); mutex_unlock(&binding->lock); } break;