From: Ruediger Pluem <rpluem@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:38:38 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * Add some comments.
X-Git-Tag: 2.2.7~303
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=433545bce921d63ced646a196cea626c3e873181;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

* Add some comments.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@584867 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 9c6891717ba..32f5618c224 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      rewritten.
      jim says: Is rpluem's concern addressed?
      niq says: Yes, when we add r584842 to the proposal.
+     rpluem says: Yes.
      
    * mpm_winnt: Fix null pointer dereference
      PR 42572
@@ -203,6 +204,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      -1: jim: As per Roy, (forward) proxies should not check
               the URI. See r583466 and r583803.
      niq: updated proposal to address Roy & Jim's points.
+     rpluem: The first hunk of your patch fails (the include) because it is
+     already there. Remove this and I am +1.
 
    * core: backport ap_send_interim_response API
      http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582630
@@ -220,6 +223,8 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      Once fixed I am +1.
      niq says: Do you mean my addition to the documentation included
      in r582631, or is there something else that needs reconciling?
+     rpluem says: Yes, there is a conflict in backporting the mod_proxy_http.xml
+     changes of r582631.
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED