From: Eric Covener Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 01:59:37 +0000 (+0000) Subject: committed X-Git-Tag: 2.2.32~31 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4355af37b8c1350d49c7fc745a8016b5ac996039;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git committed git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@1777406 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index fc0cfd9fef2..096f522182a 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -102,41 +102,6 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] - *) Rather than odds-and-ends applied out of order, proposing we revert - r1757240, r1757256, r1757295, r1758671, r1758672, r1775232, all of - which is now recorded in the 2.2.x-merge-http-strict branch, and - bring that branch back into 2.2.x for 2.2.32 release. - Merges; - -c-1775232 . - -c-1757672 . - -c-1757671 . - -c-1757295 . - -c-1757256 . - -c-1757240 . - [here we are back at 2.2.32-dev bump] - -r1775685:1775780 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x-merge-http-strict/ - Roll-up patch of the above (not recommended for casual reading, these - would be committed individually as noted above... but for only for sanity - testing the end result. Due to intervening CHANGES/ap_mmn changes, there - is small delta after reverting the above...) - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wrowe/patches/master/httpd-2.2-HEAD-http-protocol-strict.patch - This patch above does *NOT* apply to the 2.2.31 release, c.f. the delta - of the 2.2.x-merge-http-strict branch for that information. This is for - folks who are testing rollbacks plus 2.4.x activity against 2.2.x HEAD! - Sorry to start from scratch, but yann's correct observation was correct, - that nothing will apply out-of-order, and everything on 2.2 branch had - already become disordered. - +1: wrowe, covener, ylavic - covener: - - need to rebase patch on branch to pick up one-liner changes in - r1777178 and r1777182 - ylavic: - httpd-2.2-HEAD-http-protocol-strict.patch + r1777178 + r1777182 worked, - but not the former procedure (merge conflicts). - wrowe asks: covener, would you apply? I'd like to have at least a second - pair of hands and eyes on merging this to branches/2.2.x and - am happy to compare/verify against my working copy. - PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]