From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 04:30:21 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Merge branch 'bpf-skmsg-some-fixes-for-skmsg' X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4e7c52b178a75d9e733761ccae9fc25eaa7d8583;p=thirdparty%2Flinux.git Merge branch 'bpf-skmsg-some-fixes-for-skmsg' Jiayuan Chen says: ==================== bpf, skmsg: some fixes for skmsg All fixes are from previous patches sent by Weiming Shi, Zhang Cen, Kuniyuki and Sechang Lim, which have already been reviewed by me and John and Jakub. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260610081218.506709-2-rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260520102715.3033936-1-rollkingzzc@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260424191602.1522411-3-bestswngs@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260423155807.1245644-2-bestswngs@gmail.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260221233234.3814768-4-kuniyu@google.com/ The automated reviewer (sashiko) may still flag a few other potential issues on top of this series. After looking into them, they are either already covered by the patches here, are the BPF program's own responsibility (e.g. initializing the payload it pushes) and intentionally left out, or only reachable under very narrow conditions that require a specially crafted BPF program and an unusual sk_msg ring state, so they are not practical to trigger and are left out of this series. I'm collecting these fixes together because the same problems have been re-sent many times in slightly different forms, and I hope this series can be prioritized for merging so the duplicates can finally settle. With so many AI-generated patches floating around for these spots, leaving them unmerged just keeps wasting maintainer review cycles on the same issues. v3->v4: Carry Kuniyuki Iwashima's reviewed-by tag. Drop the __GFP_ZERO patch; initializing the pushed payload is the BPF program's responsibility, not the kernel's (per maintainer feedback). https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260612130919.299124-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev/ v2->v3: Target to bpf-next and carry Emil's reviewed-by tag. Reverse xmas tree style is used suggested by Cong. (not all code match reverse xmas tree due to variable dependency) v1->v2: fix problem when fix the conflict. ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260615021959.140010-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- 4e7c52b178a75d9e733761ccae9fc25eaa7d8583