From: Ruediger Pluem Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:55:20 +0000 (+0000) Subject: * Promote and comment. X-Git-Tag: 2.2.7~41 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=4ed82fadbe8f1f5bfbf94566ffe14718fc7f31ce;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git * Promote and comment. git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@607469 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS index 0af59cad1bb..dc14e6323b4 100644 --- a/STATUS +++ b/STATUS @@ -93,18 +93,10 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: give us UTF-8). Also mod_dav embeds r->uri in the response: we would need to URL-escape that before HTML-escaping it to ensure that it's ISO-8859-1-compatible. - - * mod_proxy_balancer: Prevent crash in balancer manager if invalid balancer - name is passed as parameter. - Trunk version of patch: - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607273&view=rev - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607402&view=rev (CVE number added - to CHANGES entry) - Backport version for 2.2.x of patch: - Trunk version of patch works - +1: rpluem, jorton - niq: +1 to the fix, but wouldn't it be a good idea to log a debug - message rather than silently ignore it if the test fails? + rpluem says: Please see my answers on list. Keep in mind that we do NOT + create a regression by this patch but only enforce browsers + who do not act in an RFC compliant manner to do so. + So please reconsider your -1. * mod_proxy_balancer: Correctly escape the worker route and the worker redirect string in the HTML output of the balancer manager. @@ -129,6 +121,22 @@ RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS: PATCHES ACCEPTED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ start all new proposals below, under PATCHES PROPOSED. ] + * mod_proxy_balancer: Prevent crash in balancer manager if invalid balancer + name is passed as parameter. + Trunk version of patch: + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607273&view=rev + http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607402&view=rev (CVE number added + to CHANGES entry) + Backport version for 2.2.x of patch: + Trunk version of patch works + +1: rpluem, jorton + niq: +1 to the fix, but wouldn't it be a good idea to log a debug + message rather than silently ignore it if the test fails? + rpluem: I do not see this need right now as this cannot happen if you + use the link contructed by the balancer manager. It can only + happen if you construct the URL by yourself. But I may change my + mind once I have to do bug hunting in this area :-). + PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK: [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]