From: Roger Dingledine Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:09:54 +0000 (+0000) Subject: cleanups on proposal 105 X-Git-Tag: tor-0.2.0.1-alpha~316 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=528260066283ea4eb5758b64574c867191b098ef;p=thirdparty%2Ftor.git cleanups on proposal 105 svn:r9893 --- diff --git a/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt b/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt index c7c709403a..b1df7851f8 100644 --- a/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt +++ b/doc/spec/proposals/105-handshake-revision.txt @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ Discussion: Advertising versions in routerdescs and networkstatuses. The networkstatus "v" line now has the format: "v" IMPLEMENTATION IMPL-VERSION "Link" LINK-VERSION-LIST - Circuit" CIRCUIT-VERSION-LIST NL + "Circuit" CIRCUIT-VERSION-LIST NL LINK-VERSION-LIST and CIRCUIT-VERSION-LIST are comma-separated lists of supported version numbers. IMPLEMENTATION is the name of the @@ -246,14 +246,14 @@ Discussion: Advertising versions in routerdescs and networkstatuses. version of the implementation. Examples: - v Tor 0.2.5.1-alpha Link 0,1,2,3 Circuit 0,2,5 + v Tor 0.2.5.1-alpha Link 1,2,3 Circuit 2,5 v OtherOR 2000+ Link 3 Circuit 5 Implementations that release independently of the Tor codebase SHOULD NOT use "Tor" as the value of their IMPLEMENTATION. - Additional fields on the "v" line MUSTbe ignored. + Additional fields on the "v" line MUST be ignored. In router descriptors: