From: Patrick Palka Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 18:10:28 +0000 (-0500) Subject: c++: error recovery during C++20 template-id ADL failure X-Git-Tag: basepoints/gcc-13~2932 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=53c964ad996a1bb22566b987eafb333b5899deab;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git c++: error recovery during C++20 template-id ADL failure When diagnosing ADL failure we try to perform a second unqualified lookup for backwards compatibility with legacy code (via -fpermissive), and for better diagnostics. But for C++20 template-id ADL, the backwards compatibility code sometimes causes confusing subsequent diagnostics such as in the testcase below where we end up diagnosing deduction failure after emitting the helpful "no declarations were found by ADL". This happens because the code just discards the arguments of the template-id callee when replacing it with the later-declared template, which leads to overload resolution failure: : In instantiation of ‘void f() [with T = int]’: :12:22: required from here :5:9: error: ‘g’ was not declared in this scope, and no declarations were found by argument-dependent lookup at the point of instantiation [-fpermissive] :10:6: note: ‘template void g(int)’ declared here, later in the translation unit :5:9: error: no matching function for call to ‘g(int)’ :10:6: note: candidate: ‘template void g(int)’ :10:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: :5:9: note: couldn’t deduce template parameter ‘T’ So for C++20 template-id ADL, this patch disables the backwards compatibility code while keeping the helpful "no declarations were found by ADL" diagnostic. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) : Disable the -fpermissive fallback for C++20 template-id ADL, but keep the diagnostic. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template25.C: New test. --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c index ad51c07347b5..71a771fd0f2e 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c @@ -20439,7 +20439,8 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t, (function, 1)))) && !any_type_dependent_arguments_p (call_args)) { - if (TREE_CODE (function) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR) + bool template_id_p = (TREE_CODE (function) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR); + if (template_id_p) function = TREE_OPERAND (function, 0); if (koenig_p && (complain & tf_warning_or_error)) { @@ -20454,20 +20455,21 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t, if (unq != function) { - /* In a lambda fn, we have to be careful to not - introduce new this captures. Legacy code can't - be using lambdas anyway, so it's ok to be - stricter. */ - bool in_lambda = (current_class_type - && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (current_class_type)); char const *const msg = G_("%qD was not declared in this scope, " "and no declarations were found by " "argument-dependent lookup at the point " "of instantiation"); + bool in_lambda = (current_class_type + && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (current_class_type)); + /* In a lambda fn, we have to be careful to not + introduce new this captures. Legacy code can't + be using lambdas anyway, so it's ok to be + stricter. Be strict with C++20 template-id ADL too. */ + bool strict = in_lambda || template_id_p; bool diag = true; - if (in_lambda) + if (strict) error_at (cp_expr_loc_or_input_loc (t), msg, function); else @@ -20503,7 +20505,7 @@ tsubst_copy_and_build (tree t, inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (fn), "%qD declared here, later in the " "translation unit", fn); - if (in_lambda) + if (strict) RETURN (error_mark_node); } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template25.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template25.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..5da409c2a1be --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/fn-template25.C @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template +void f() { + g(T{}); // { dg-error "argument-dependent lookup" } + // { dg-bogus "no match" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } +} + +template +void g(int); // { dg-message "declared here, later" } + +template void f();