From: Nick Kew <niq@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 20:31:52 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Comments
X-Git-Tag: 2.2.7~271
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=54d9a9382ff58db0519ad5428e697d8d00b17e4c;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

Comments


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@589842 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index a144a13dd3e..cbb69796029 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      jim: The comment says 'so just check it for disallowed chars' which,
           at least from what I can see regarding the patch applied to
           2.2, we do not do.
+     niq: Oh, I see.  You prefer an all-in-one patch for both?
 
    * core: backport ap_send_interim_response API
      http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=582630
@@ -222,6 +223,9 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
      2.2.x:
         Trunk version of patch works
      +1: jim, rpluem
+     niq: Doesn't allocating 2^n+1 bytes risk being horribly inefficient?
+          Would it make sense to reduce AP_IOBUFSIZE to 8091 so buf doesn't
+          go one over a big boundary?
 
 PATCHES/ISSUES THAT ARE STALLED