From: Paul Querna <pquerna@apache.org>
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 18:38:10 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: Move my -0 to a +1 for this patch, after going back and reading more of the email... 
X-Git-Tag: 2.2.1~7
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=5663f9310468a5710e95c02fb5e9cf67fa50404a;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

Move my -0 to a +1 for this patch, after going back and reading more of the email about it.  It isn't pretty, but there just isn't a better way for now.


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x@390721 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 57b3d9f2343..e75a74b1634 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -114,8 +114,7 @@ PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
          http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384580&view=rev
          http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390210&view=rev
          http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=390619&view=rev
-      +1: jim, rpluem
-      -0: pquerna
+      +1: jim, rpluem, pquerna
       pquerna says: Why is this configuration for AJP polluting mod_proxy.h?
                     Shouldn't we be keeping the configuration of a Proxy Provider
                     separate from the main mod_proxy?