From: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:45:14 +0000 (+0800)
Subject: selftests/bpf: rbtree: Fix incorrect global variable usage
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=64a064ce33b193a681f1eb52ac1ad09aadda9944;p=thirdparty%2Fkernel%2Fstable.git

selftests/bpf: rbtree: Fix incorrect global variable usage

Within __add_three() function, should use function parameters instead of
global variables. So that the variables groot_nested.inner.root and
groot_nested.inner.glock in rbtree_add_nodes_nested() are tested
correctly.

Signed-off-by: Rong Tao <rongtao@cestc.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/tencent_3DD7405C0839EBE2724AC5FA357B5402B105@qq.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
index a3620c15c136..49fe93d7e059 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/rbtree.c
@@ -61,19 +61,19 @@ static long __add_three(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_spin_lock *lock)
 	}
 	m->key = 1;
 
-	bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
-	bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less);
-	bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &m->node, less);
-	bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
+	bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less);
+	bpf_rbtree_add(root, &m->node, less);
+	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 
 	n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n));
 	if (!n)
 		return 3;
 	n->key = 3;
 
-	bpf_spin_lock(&glock);
-	bpf_rbtree_add(&groot, &n->node, less);
-	bpf_spin_unlock(&glock);
+	bpf_spin_lock(lock);
+	bpf_rbtree_add(root, &n->node, less);
+	bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
 	return 0;
 }