From: André Malo <nd@apache.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:48:15 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: address a concern
X-Git-Tag: 2.0.48~104
X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b08cecb1c08cf81242205535da5ccb1c3b0d8ab;p=thirdparty%2Fapache%2Fhttpd.git

address a concern


git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/APACHE_2_0_BRANCH@101145 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
---

diff --git a/STATUS b/STATUS
index 62da039aad0..3392807c84a 100644
--- a/STATUS
+++ b/STATUS
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 APACHE 2.0 STATUS:                                              -*-text-*-
-Last modified at [$Date: 2003/08/31 16:20:34 $]
+Last modified at [$Date: 2003/08/31 20:48:15 $]
 
 Release:
 
@@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ PATCHES TO PORT FROM 2.1
         modules/filters/mod_include.c: r1.235, r1.236
         modules/filters/mod_include.h: r1.35
       jerenkrantz asks: Doesn't this require a MMN bump?
+      nd replies: The rewrite contains a wrapper around the new API that
+                  emulates the old one. The only difference is that
+                  foo_start_bucket/_index fields are not filled as before
+                  (and ssi_tag_brigade is always NULL). Since they are only of
+                  internal meaning I do not think that the change requires a
+                  bump.
       +1: nd, brianp
 
     * Fix include_cmd in mod_cgid, not to treat the cmd output (partially)