From: Jason Merrill Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:02:21 +0000 (-0400) Subject: c++: constexpr, empty base after non-empty [PR106369] X-Git-Tag: releases/gcc-12.2.0~13 X-Git-Url: http://git.ipfire.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?a=commitdiff_plain;h=6b7d570a5001bb79e34c0d1626a8c7f55386dac7;p=thirdparty%2Fgcc.git c++: constexpr, empty base after non-empty [PR106369] Here the CONSTRUCTOR we were providing for D{} had an entry for the B base subobject at offset 0 following the entry for the C base, causing output_constructor_regular_field to ICE due to going backwards. It might be nice for that function to be more tolerant of empty fields, but it also seems reasonable for the front end to prune the useless entry. PR c++/106369 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (reduced_constant_expression_p): Return false if a CONSTRUCTOR initializes an empty field. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda27.C: New test. (cherry picked from commit 9efe4e153d994974afcbba09c3c683f5f4a19c63) --- diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc index 1c17f0d14b87..28f8785dea32 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc @@ -3063,7 +3063,13 @@ reduced_constant_expression_p (tree t) element. */ if (!reduced_constant_expression_p (e.value)) return false; - /* Empty class field may or may not have an initializer. */ + /* We want to remove initializers for empty fields in a struct to + avoid confusing output_constructor. */ + if (is_empty_field (e.index) + && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (t)) == RECORD_TYPE) + return false; + /* Check for non-empty fields between initialized fields when + CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING. */ for (; field && e.index != field; field = next_subobject_field (DECL_CHAIN (field))) if (!is_really_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (field), diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda27.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda27.C new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..24e2e9b6c989 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-lambda27.C @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +// PR c++/106369 +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } } + +struct A { + int a[256]; + constexpr int &operator[] (int n) noexcept { return a[n]; } + constexpr const int &operator[] (int n) const noexcept { return a[n]; } +}; +struct B {}; +template +struct C { + constexpr T &foo (const char x) noexcept { c = T::d[x]; return static_cast(*this); } + int c; +}; +struct D : public C, public B +{ + D () noexcept = default; + static constexpr char e[9] { 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F', 'G', 'H', 'I' }; + static constexpr A d = [] () constexpr { + A f {}; + for (int i = 0; i < 9; ++i) + f[e[i]] = 1; + return f; + } (); +}; +constexpr auto g = D{}.foo ('E');